Series of Places of Detention Assessment Reports (02) infrastructure of the Jericho CRC. They were distributed as follows: • The CRC’s compatibility rate for the infrastructure and inmate accommodation facilities provisions in the prison was 2.0, reflecting good compliance with international standards.The CRC’s compatibility rate for service facilities in the prison was 2.6, which reflects compliance to a certain degree with international standards. The overall compatibility rate of the Jericho CRC in relation to the total standard for women’s detention CRCs was 2.1, reflecting compliance to some degree with international standards. It should be noted that no juvenile inmates were present at the CRC at the time of the assessment. Remarks on Assessment Results • Administration of the CRC: The Jericho CRC complies very well with international standards for prison administration in terms of having documented policies, directives and instructions about the CRC’s administration. Although the ratio of staff to inmates is 47.2%, the use of electronic monitoring methods has contributed to reducing the need for human personnel and made it possible to consider the CRC to be compatible with international standards in this regard. Perhaps the only deficiency in the compatibility of the administration of the Jericho CRC, is in the absence of a clear and documented system for managing the vocational rehabilitation facilities available at the CRC, in addition to the fact that the CRC is not qualified for the receipt and presence of persons with disabilities, including staff, inmates and visitors. In addition, there is no policy that limits the number of working hours for inmates, because working in all CRCs is a privilege and is not binding. • CRC staff: There is no system or specific standards for incentives and penalties that govern the CRC staff, in addition to the absence of any additional financial compensation compared with the rest of the police members or an allowance for the nature of work. In addition, there are no clear or written criteria for appointing staff in CRCs, and no employees with disabilities have been appointed according to the known percentages. 22 INDEPENDENT COMMISSION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS