undocumented migrants, receive primary and secondary education by amending and implementing the Enforcement Decree on the Primary and Secondary Education Act in October 2010. Therefore, regarding paragraph 115 of the report, the NHRCK recommended including this fact in the report and the recommendation was reflected. Regarding paragraph 44 of the report, the NHRCK conducted the ‘Study on the Status of Educational Rights of Migrant Children (hereinafter referred as the “study”)’ in 2010. The study highlighted the importance of implementing various measures, such as developing various programs to strengthen migrant children’s access to public education, exempting public education officials from the duty of public servants to report undocumented aliens (the Ministry of Justice currently aims to make amendments regarding the exemption of the reporting obligation), offering the specialized Korean language education for migrant children, providing tailored education that concerns the background of migrant children, and preparing precautions against migrant children’s drop-outs. In an effort to accurately capture current issues, the NHRCK requested such measures based on the study to be included in the report. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Relevant to paragraph 85 of the report, two undocumented migrants related to a foreign workers’ union were arrested and forcefully deported by the Immigration Office in December 2007. The deportation occurred during the NHRCK’s investigation. Thus, regarding this case, the NHRCK recommended the Ministry of Justice to come up with measures to respect the rights to counsel for undocumented foreigners, revise laws and regulations to protect the rights of foreigners and enforce deportation in line with penal due procedures, and postpone the enforcement of deportation until the NHRCK finishes its investigation. The NHRCK suggested incorporating this case in the report. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Paragraph 121 of the report concerns the NHRCK’s investigation on foreigners. In January 2008, the NHRCK discovered that the head of a migration detention center did not accept a petition to the NHRCK filed by a foreigner. The NHRCK concluded the case as violating human rights and urged preventive measures in this regard. Moreover, the NHRCK requested the Ministry of Justice to rectify the unlawfully entering the working places where migrants are working and to stop exerting excessive force in October 3