violence to the school authorities or public authorities and not even to their parents. This was because of shame or ignorance. In 2 cases when the rape incidences were disclosed to parents or teachers, the respondents related that these incidences were not heeded, or they had to take the blame for being themselves. By administrators101 106. Table 6 below shows the abuses/violence experienced by respondents due to gender identity, gender expression and/or sexual orientation from administrators of educational institutions. They had experienced hate speech from administrator (7/97), followed by name calling by administrator (5/97) and “cold shoulder” treatment by administrator (5/97). Frequency TW TM Intersex Table 6: Experience of abuses/violence in educational institutions due to gender identity, gender expression and/or sexual orientation by administrators 1. Hate speech 7/97 4 2 1 2. Name calling 5/97 3 1 1 3. Cold shoulder 5/97 5 0 0 4. Spread of rumours about your gender identity in the educational institutions, neighbourhood, online spaces, etc. 3/97 2 1 0 5. Physical violence (e.g. beaten up, hit, kicked, physical fights, pushed etc.) 2/97 1 0 1 6. Confined or locked up 1/97 1 0 0 7. Isolated 1/97 1 0 0 8. Public humiliation (publicly scolded, reprimanded or punished because of gender identity) 1/97 1 0 0 9. Unwanted sexual gestures, language, image 0/97 0 0 0 10. Molestation or unwanted touching 0/97 0 0 0 11. Threat of rape 0/97 0 0 0 12. Rape or coerced sex 0/97 0 0 0 Item Note: TW: Trans women (69 persons), TM: Trans men (29 persons), Intersex: 2 persons 101 Administrators is including school principal, assistant school principal, school administrators, dean, vice dean and college/university administrators. 46 | Report On Transgender Persons In KL And Selangor