A Year of Human Rights Covenants: Great Leap for Taiwan National Human Rights Commission, Taiwan ii. Japan adopts a program of ranking and division in drawing up the treatment plan and adjustment for individual cases to facilitate social reentry. iii. The competent authorities of Japan also provided for the “probation officers” to coordinate various support resources and help offenders re-enter communities for independent living. Taiwan should probably consider such an arrangement. iv. Offenders still need to be treated fairly to prevent discrimination and violation of their human rights. v. Eliminating social bias through diversification and deinstitutionalization of treatment to progressively bridge the reality-ideal gap. vi. NGO initiatives and international review are the driving force to advance the human rights of offenders with mental disabilities. vii. In Japan a rental system is introduced to promote resource sharing and circulation among persons with disabilities. It reduces the procurement cost, becoming a tool for helping independent living. c. Human rights project for inmates with disabilities This project owes its origin to the 2018 investigation on whether or not correctional facilities can help inmates with neurocognitive disorder access the required services during their terms to achieve the goal of “habilitation and rehabilitation” as specified in Article 26 of the CRPD. Moreover, in terms of Article 9, the proportion of “inmates holding disability ID and unable to work” accounted for 8.29%, 6.78%, and 5.90% respectively of “inmates with disability ID” from 2016 to 2018. Currently, persons with disabilities holding a disability ID and meeting specific requirements ▋ Discussion and seminar with the reviewers of the international review on the “Second International Review on the Implementation of CRPD.” National Human Rights Commission 2022 Annual Report 49