STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK ON A NATIONAL ACTION PLAN ON BUSINESS AND
HUMAN RIGHTS FOR MALAYSIA
84
United Kingdom. (2013). Good Business – Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights,
Part 2. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/236901/
BHR_Action_Plan_-_final_online_version_1_.pdf
85
Petronas. (25 Oct 2015). Press Statement – Petronas’ Fuel Supply Services in Sudan. Retrieved from http://www.
petronas.com.my/media-relations/media-releases/Pages/article/Press-Statement---PETRONAS%E2%80%99fuel-supply-services-in-Sudan.aspx. Long Seh Lih. (2013). Business and human rights in ASEAN – A baseline
study, Malaysia Report. p. 234. Retrieved from http://hrrca.org/system/files/u6/Business%20and%20
Human%20Rights%20in%20ASEAN%20Baseline%20Study%20ebook.pdf. Bloomberg. (29 Mar 2010). Malaysia
Smelting, Rwandan Company Are Main Buyers of Congo Tin. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/
news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a1p3C4mCsY2o.
86
U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 1502. See U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. Specialized Corporate Reporting. Accessed at https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/dodd-frank/
speccorpdisclosure.shtml
87
European Commission. (5 March 2014). EU proposes responsible trading strategy for minerals from conflict zones.
Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-218_en.htm
88
United Nations, Human Rights Council. (2008). Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on
the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, Protect,
Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights, A/HRC/8/5, para. 22. Retrieved from http://
www.reports-and-materials.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-report-7-Apr-2008.pdf
89
See e.g. UNOHCHR. Sub-Commission on Human Rights. (16 Aug 2001). Resolution 2001/21. Intellectual Property
and Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/SRHRL/PDF/IHRDArticle15/E-CN_4SUB_2-RES-2000-7_Eng.pdf. The Economic Times. (25 Jun 2012). India, Brazil & China defend generic drugs at
WTO. Retrieved from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-06-25/news/32409062_1_counterfeitmedicines-fake-drugs-generic-drugs
90
L.E. Peterson. International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development. (2009). Human Rights and
Bilateral Investment Treaties. Mapping the role of human rights law within investor-state arbitration, pp. 38-39.
Piero Foresti, Laura de Carli and others v. Republic of South Africa (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/1).
91
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no. ARB/97/3);
Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe, S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Interagua Servicios
Integrales de Agua, S.A. v. Argentine Republic (Case no. ARB/03/17); Aguas Cordobesas, S.A., Suez, and Sociedad
General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. v. Argentine Republic (Case no. ARB/03/18); Aguas Argentinas, S.A., Suez,
Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal, S.A. v. Argentine Republic (Case no. ARB/03/19);
Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no. ARB/01/12); Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no.
ARB/03/30); SAUR International v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no. ARB/04/4); Anglian Water Group v. Argentine
Republic, UNCITRAL arbitration filed in 2003; Impregilo S.p.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no. ARB/07/17);
Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Biskaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case
no. ARB/07/26).
92
Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, NAFTA Chapter 11 Award, 2002; Chemtura v. Canada, NAFTA
Chapter 11 Award, 2010.
47