deviation towards the world of crime by modern methods that are lost costly than prisons and more considerate of the human rights of the person convicted of a particular crime, while safeguarding his human dignity, who would certainly not sever his ties to his family and community. 13. The alternatives to the punishment of imprisonment could be represented in a set of punishments and precautionary measures ensuring the reform of an individual while concurrently making him remorseful for committing the crime for which he deserved punishment to prevent its commission in future time while also deterring others, or could be represented in criminal conciliation, particularly since some of the convicts enjoy a high social standing or were led to commit the crime by coincidence or under the influence of an urgent need or due to a particular nervous and psychological state which requires treating those persons differently. On the other hand most of the misdemeanours and contraventions are punishable by imprisonment for a short period of time, where scientists argue that the punishment is ineffective but would in fact be a direct cause of the corruption of the individual instead of his reformation. 14.  Thus most national legislations have inclined to affording criminal conciliation, whether the countries that have the Anglo-Saxon legal system such as the United States and Britain, or the countries that adopt the Latin system, specifically in minor crimes, where all almost concur on the superficiality of the crime and that it does not strongly affect society and the public interest which must be safeguarded. Hence, there does not exist a state which applies the criminal conciliation system that permits conciliation in serious crimes or crimes that impinge on state security, whereby conciliation exists to be an exit route to end a criminal lawsuit in minor offenses in a manner that guarantees the penalization of the accused and the achievement of justice. 15. Moreover, the benefits arising from criminal conciliation lie in encompassing the will of the government or the public prosecution and the accused, where the former avoids prolonged penal procedures through courts and thence enforcement, and the second is represented in relieving him from standing in court and thence sentencing him with a punishment exceeding the conciliation ruling with the administrative quarter. 16. The criminal conciliation system contributes to lessening the burdens of prisons and detention centers on the persons who conciliated with the competent governmental department, whereby the prisons became a shelter solely for those convicted. The criminal conciliation with the accused entails vitiating all the consequences of the criminal ruling convicting the accused which was the subject of conciliation, and hence it would not be entered in the criminal record of the accused and would not impinge on the legal capacity of the conciliator in any way. 17. Therefore, the National Institution emphasizes the soundness of the orientation of the draft law to give due regard to the interest of the victim of crimes of manslaughter and unintended injury who is more interested in compensation for the damage befalling him than in the punishment of the accused, and moreover those amendments aim to expedite the procedures of judgment in some cases through reducing the number of cases heard in criminal courts by means of conciliation. 21