designated for them, while they were almost not present inside the public polling and counting centers. Indicator: Were there any voters present whose names were not registered in the voters’ lists? Indicator: Were any voters disenfranchised? 10. The NIHR’s monitoring team witnessed very few cases of preventing voters from casting their votes in the elections (disenfranchised) mostly because their names were missing from the voters’ lists; hence, they were asked to check with the supervisory centers of their governorates. In one case, which was monitored by the NIHR via social media, the voter was prevented from entering the center in the Tenth Constituency in the Capital Governorate because he was wearing clothes that were not suitable for the polling and counting center. Indicator: Were persons whose names were not registered in the voters’ lists allowed to cast their votes? Indicator: Were unauthorized persons allowed into the polling hall? 11. The NIHR’s monitoring team did not observe any cases where non-voters were allowed to enter the polling and counting hall, except for a number of children accompanying their parents, where in some cases, the voters give their children the ballot paper to insert it in the ballot box under their 72