During further examina�on in the Public Inquiry into the disappearance of Amri Che Mat, Inspector Khor was shown the JPJ par�culars of the vehicle bearing registra�on number PFC 1623. He was asked whether the owner of the vehicle was one Saiful Bahari bin Abdul Aziz (“Saiful Bahari”) as stated in the JPJ records. He confirmed that Saiful Bahari was indeed the owner and the person whose statement his officer had recorded. However, he stated that he could not remember Saiful Bahari’s occupa�on. 125. Following that, Inspector Khor was given a list of wri�en ques�ons, including ques�ons about the gold Toyota Vios for him to ascertain evidence about the owner during a break in the hearing of the Public Inquiry. The list of ques�ons was submi�ed by Counsel for the family of Amri Che Mat to Inspector Khor with the consent of the Panel. In his wri�en answers, Inspector Khor iden�fied Saiful Bahari as an administra�ve assistant working at the Police Training Center (PULAPOL) at Jalan Semarak in Kuala Lumpur. In evidence, Inspector Khor said that Saiful Bahari had stopped work at PULAPOL in November 2017. He said he tried to locate Saiful Bahari at his home address but Saiful Bahari could not be found there. Inspector Khor informed that Saiful Bahari's supervisor at PULAPOL was one Inspector Mohd Azizie Abd Hamid (IW21) (“Mohd Azizie”). It was later learnt that Mohd Azizie was in fact holding the rank of an ASP and not an Inspector, a�ached to the Special Branch, Kuala Lumpur. 126. On 6 August 2018 and 27 August 2018, ASP Mohd Azizie tes�fied in the Public Inquiry into the disappearance of Amri Che Mat. He iden�fied himself as an Assistant Superintendent of Police with the Logis�cs Management and Housing Department of the Special Branch in Bukit Aman. He said that Saiful Bahari was the only staff a�ached to him at the material �me in PULAPOL and gave the impression that Saiful Bahari’s job was as a low-level general handyman, said to be in charge of cleaning and maintenance of the Police accommoda�on in PULAPOL. ASP Mohd Azizie claimed that Saiful Bahari stopped coming to work in early November 2017, while his contract expired in March 2018. A week a�er Saiful Bahari stopped coming to work, ASP Mohd Azizie said that he tried to contact him and even visited his home but Saiful Bahari could not be located. He also claimed that Saiful Bahari could not have been in the Toyota Vios sighted by Vee Yak in late November 2016 because according to a Schedule of leave which he prepared, Saiful Bahari was working in Kuala Lumpur for the 10 days before Amri Che Mat's disappearance. He later confirmed that the Schedule of Leave which he prepared based on Saiful Bahari's leave applica�ons, was for the purposes of giving his evidence at the Public Inquiry. 43 PASTOR RAYMOND KOH 124.