National Human Right Commission no information about their arrest. The complainant had thus sought the intervention of the Commission in the matter. 4.41 Pursuant to the directions given by the Commission, it was informed that a case vide Crime No. 01/2015 u/s 323/330/355 IPC r/w Section 10 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and 20, 12 and Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, was registered against the named police personnel, which was under investigation and the erring police personnel have Chapter - 4 CID had registered an FIR against the two erring police personnel there was also been suspended from their services. 4.42 The Commission further considered the matter and observed that it is unfortunate that police personnel who were entrusted with the safety and security of its citizens, are shockingly found indulging in the act of forcing young boys to have unnatural sexual that may have an everlasting effect on their minds. The subjection of the young boys to such an act inside the police custody is a gross violation of the human rights of the victims. The Chief Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu was thus directed to show cause u/s 18 (a) (i) of the PHR Act, 1993 as to why a monetary compensation of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty-five Thousand only) should not be recommended to be paid to each of the victims. The matter continues to be under the consideration of the Commission. 10. A Journalist Mercilessly Beaten-up by Police near Village Barara and Then Brought to Police Station Barara in Ambala, Haryana (Case No. 6029/7/1/2012) 4.43 The complainant Shri Sandeep Kumar, a journalist, complained to the Commission that in the evening of 17 August 2012, when he wanted to take photograph of the SHO of Police Station Barara and other Police Constables, Annual Report - 2015-2016 53

Выберите целевой абзац3