situation as well as demonstrate the Government’s effort on this matter. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Regarding paragraph 100 of the report, the fact that foreign women, who enter the country with entertainment visas (E-6) from Southeast Asian countries, often work in the sex industry is widely known. As civil society strongly argued that this situation could lead to trafficking of foreign women, the NHRCK recommended incorporating the Government’s countermeasures for the prevention of human trafficking in the report. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Regarding paragraph 129 of the report, the Multicultural Families Support Act, established in 2008, used the term ‘multicultural families’ in referring to foreigners who marry Korean nationals or naturalize. With this respect, civil society strongly criticized that the Government’s support usually concerned families of married immigrants and their children. Therefore, the NHRCK recommended including this matter in the report as it revealed problems related to regulations, systems, policies, and practices. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Correction of statistical data, status updates, regulations and factual information With regard to paragraph 10 and paragraph 84 of the report, the NHRCK recommended updating statistical data and its recommendation was reflected in the report. As recommended by the NHRCK, the report modified the following paragraphs: paragraph 20(supplemented laws), paragraph 50(modified inappropriate description), paragraph 64(corrected the content of the law), paragraph 67(used proper terminology related to international law), paragraph 71(used proper terminology related to the law and corrected the content), paragraph 91(corrected the content related to the law), and paragraph 111(added the fact that the law was amended and implemented) 4. Conclusion The NHRCK appreciates that the report partially reflected its 7