RESEARCH The partnership between the NCHR and its domestic and foreign partners also occurred when the NCHR collaborated with INFID, the United Cities and Local Governments Asia Pacific, and Raoul Wallenberg Institute held an event with the theme of human rights cities and the SDGs in South Korea.144 During the NCHR Internal FGD, it was asked through the questionnaire on how far the impacts of five classifications made for the NCHR activities towards the SDGs within this chapter is towards the achievement of the SDGs in Indonesia in relation with human rights.145 Fifteen people filled the questionnaire and three of them are the commissioners of the NCHR. The following table display the answer to the questionnaire: IMPACT OF ACTIVITIES TOWARDS THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SDGs IN CONNECTION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ACCORDING TO THE FGD’S PARTICIPANTS ON 26 JANUARY 2021 FROM THE NCHR:146 Impact of Activities towards the SDGs and Human Rights No. Activities Not Aware Not Beneficial Less Beneficial Beneficial Very Beneficial 1. The Establishment of the NCHR’s SDGs Team 0 6,7% 0 73,3% 20% 2. The NCHR as the SDGs Coordinator for the Asia Pacific 6,7% 0 6,7% 66,7% 20% 3. The SDGs Web-Based Tool based on Human Rights 0 20% 0 80% 0 144 Yuli Asmini, “Forum Kota HAM Dunia dan Peran Penting Komnas HAM” [Human Rights Cities World Forum and the Important Roles of the NCHR], Komnas HAM, published on 24 October 2018, https:// www.komnasham.go.id/index.php/news/2018/10/24/651/forum-kota-ham-dunia-and-peran-pentingkomnas-ham.html. 145 It is important to state that when a respondent is questioned with closed questions (yes or no): whether the respondent is aware or have heard of (1) The establishment of the NCHR's SDGs Team, there was 1 respondent (6.7%) answered no; (2) The NCHR as the SDGs Coordinator for Asia Pacific, there were 2 respondents (13.3%) answered no; (3) The SDGs Web-Based Tool based on Human Rights Indicator, there was 1 respondent (6.7%) answered no; (4) Annual Report and Strategic Plan, there were 3 respondents (20%) answered no; and (5) Collaboration with Foreign or Domestic Partners, there was 1 respondent (6.7%) answered no. The data used in the matrix are using respondent answers to the questions specifically made for the interest of the creation of this matrix, it is not from the closed questions. 146 There were two activities left excluded from the matrix since there was a confirmation from the NCHR Internal FGD that one of the activities, namely: (1) Giving comments on the regional regulation related to the HIV/AIDS to the Regional House of Representative of East Java was not explicitly related to the SDGs (according to information from Mimin Dwi Hartono); meanwhile in another activity, namely: (2) One of the commissioners of the NCHR went as an expert witness in a criminal court proceeding related to the detention of a person who was a part of the indigenous people, it cannot be remembered whether it directly relates to the SDGs or not (according to the information from Sandrayati Moniaga), source: (1) NCHR Internal FGD (n. 7); and (2) NCHR List of SDG’s Activities” (n. 99). 18