37 Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560 (2017), Section 246 together with the Organic Act on the National Human Rights Commission, B.E. 2560 (2017), Article 8 stipulate that the NHRCT shall consist of seven commissioners. But as time goes by within the third quarter of fiscal year 2019, some commissioners had resigned from the office with vacate of the duties carried out in accordance with the 2017 Organic Act on the NHRCT, thus there were only three commissioners in office and not be a quorum. During 1st August to 1st November 2019, there was none of official meeting of the Commission with resolutions adopted upon the duties and powers of the NHRCT stipulated under the 2017 Constitution and the 2017 Organic Act on the NHRCT, thus there was a backlog of cases considered in significant number and could not be finalized within the 2019 fiscal year, i.e. the discretion with adoption of complaints received with merit; the discretion with adoption of human rights investigation reports made, including policy recommendations and guidance or solutions of human rights promotion; the discretion with endorsement for report (s) on the acts with compliance to the Paris Principles and relevant documents, submitted to the SCA-GANHRI; and the discretion on personnel management under the duties and powers of the NHRCT as an authorized body for personnel management. 2) The shortcomings with time delay and incompletion of information provided with comprehensiveness for the making of annual human rights assessment report of a country. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560 (2017), Section 247 (2) and the Organic Act on the National Human Rights Commission, B.E. 2560 (2017), Article 26 (2) together with Article 40 authorize the NHRCT to hold duties and powers for making of annual human rights assessment report with compilation, analysis and synthesis of data and information with comprehensiveness, accuracy and updates. In the fiscal year 2019, the NHRCT had initiated a work process with the engagement to relevant government authorities and civil society organizations along with each human rights issue. Some activities were organized as: the seminars for data sharing with opinions compiled and the issuing of official letters to relevant agencies with request for information, statistics and actions taken on relevant duties. So in general, all relevant agencies gave responses with fruitful cooperation, but there were some agencies not partaking in this process, with either not nominating any person to attend a seminar or not responding to a letter with request and even though submitting data and information requested but with late reply. Anyway, there is a proof of conflict of timeframe for data gathering, as most of agencies would gather and manage their database upon the fiscal year, while this report would be accountable to incidents incurred with information compiled on calendar year. Thus, there would be a limit of data acquired and provided with accuracy and completeness. 4.1.4 On the perceptions with mindsets towards roles and duties with outputs and outcomes of the NHRCT in comparison with international standards designed for the NHRIs under the Paris Principles: 1) Duties and powers of the NHRCT for making of clarification and report of fact with accuracy and within the delay in case of there is any report made relating to human rights situation in Thailand with inaccuracy or unjust are not in compliance with duties and powers of the NHRIs under the Paris Principles.