Commission's Major Activities
National Human Rights Commission of Korea Annual Report 2016
● Human rights violation through collection and use of personal information of call taxi users
without permission
The Commission received a complaint that the XX Taxi Federation of XX City was collecting
personal information of call taxi users—such as number of persons on board, point of departure,
destination, travel time, and purpose of visit—without their permission. The information was
collected to use as statistics for call taxi operation.
An investigation revealed that the organization was collecting and using the personal
information of taxi passengers without legal grounds and had not established any rules or
guidelines regarding this practice. The Commission found that the organization, entrusted by XX
City to operate special transportation for the visually impaired to support their daily movement
needs, did not have established regulations for the collection, use, management, and disposal
of the users’personal information but yet was collecting and using their personal information
without consent, thus violating the right to freedom and personal privacy, as set out under Article
3 and Article 15 of the Personal Information Protection Act.
Hence, on 13 May, the Commission recommended that the organization comply with the
principles for personal information protection to ensure that it does not violate the Personal
Information Protection Act, and, establish a training programme for all its employees
focusing on human rights, the right to personal privacy and personal information protection.
It also recommended that the municipal government of XX City strengthen oversight of the
organization and establish measures to prevent a recurrence of similar incidents.
D. Age discrimination
● Age discrimination in hiring flight attendant crew
The complainant filed a grievance stating that in 2014, XX Airline had discriminated against
flight attendant job applicants who were over 33 years of age by dropping them in the first paper
screening.
The Commission referred to statistics experts for analysis. The analysis result showed that,
if there had been no age discrimination, the probability that the age distribution of successful
applicants would be the same as the actual age distribution was only 0.66%. In this connection,
68