11. It is also noted that item (c) establishes legal evidence against the homeowner, which assumes the worker’s complaint shall be deemed correct if the homeowner objects to the inspection of the place of residence. There is no doubt this evidence is supposedly unconstitutional because there is no causal relationship between objection to inspection of the worker’s place within the house of the employer and the validity of the complaint. There may be considerations leading the homeowner to insist on objection to the inspection including the abuse of his moral reputation and infringement of his privacy. 12. The NIHR considers that the above mentioned article should be reviewed in such a way that doesn’t contradict the right of the individual to the privacy and the inviolability of his place of residence guaranteed by virtue of the national legislation and international covenants, so that the right of the worker to ensure the soundness of his complaint shall not be given priority over the privacy granted by the legislation for the place of residence in a way that does not contradict the provisions of Decree-by-Law No. (46) of 2002 on issuing the Code of Criminal Procedures and the amendments thereof in this regard. 13. Regarding the last Article No. (20), which stipulates that:” (a) The inspectors, who are employees of the Authority, and appointed by the CEO to perform the inspection work and ensure the execution of the provisions of this law, statues, regulations and resolutions issued in execution thereof, shall have the following mandate: 1. Accessing the workplaces, employment offices, and other related places. 2. Reviewing the registers related to foreign employees. 3. Verification of work permits and identification of foreign workers. 4. Requesting the necessary data, documents, and information from the employers, recruitment offices, their representatives, or persons in charge of actual management thereof. (b). The employers, recruitment offices, their representatives, or persons in charge of actual management thereof shall not hinder the authority’s inspectors from performing their tasks and shall provide them with the correct documents, data and information necessary for performing their tasks within suitable period to be determined by them. (c). The employees to be authorized by the Minister of Justice in agreement with the competent Minister shall have the power of judicial arrest officers as for the crimes provided for herein, committed within their jurisdiction and related to their jobs. The written reports regarding such crimes shall be referred to the Public Prosecution by virtue of a resolution to be issued by the Authority’s CEO. The NIHR hereby refers to the same opinion mentioned on Article No. (17) because the current article is related to the inspection procedures. In addition, the NIHR is of the view that the following paragraph must be added to the beginning of the Article: “Without prejudice to the provisions of Decree-by-Law No. (46) of 2002 on issuing the Code of Criminal Procedures and amendments thereof that regulates the work of the judicial arrest officers,” so that it doesn’t contradict the legal stipulations regulatinge the work of the judicial arrest officers stipulated in the Decree-by-Law No. (46) of 2002 on issuing the Code of Criminal Procedures and amendments thereof with the draft law in question. ‫اﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ اﻟﺴﻨﻮي اﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ‬ ‫ﻟﻠﻤﺆﺳﺴﺔ اﻟﻮﻃﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﺤﻘﻮق اﻧﺴﻨﺎم‬ ‫ ـ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺔ اﻟﺒﺤﺮﻳﻦ‬2015 ‫ﻟﻌﺎم‬ 38