Justice in 2009 was resulted from the accelerated procedures for the recognition of refugee status to resolve the delay in the examination process. Therefore, the NHRCK recommended modifying the statement, “Since the establishment of the Nationality and Refugee Division … the number of recognized refugees … increased significantly” as the current state was not accurately delivered. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Regarding paragraph 19 of the report, the NHRCK recommended including the fact that the Constitutional Court differentiates between the rights of nationals of the Republic of Korea and foreigners’ rights in order to provide accurate information on the judicial measures related to the implementation of the provisions of the Convention. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. With regard to paragraph 25 of the report, the NHRCK recommended including that the Constitutional Court argues that only Korean nationals are entitled to exercise not only political rights but also fundamental social rights. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Regarding paragraph 39 of the report, the term “Foreigners Residing in the Republic of Korea” in the Framework Act on Treatment of Foreigners Residing in the Republic of Korea referred only to those foreigners legally residing in Korea. As civil society and experts have strongly asserted that the Act does not display the large number of undocumented migrants residing in the Republic of Korea, the NHRCK requested including the argument in the report. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Relevant to paragraph 50 of the report, there has been a growing public sentiment that anonymity on the Internet may develop negative attitudes toward foreigners. In this regard, the NHRCK recommended that the report emphasize the importance of grasping the Government’s attention in order to accurately address the problems. However, the recommendation was not reflected in the report. Relevant to paragraph 54 of the report, the Immigration Control Act states that a foreigner, who is deemed to have committed any violation of the Immigration Control Act, shall not refuse to respond without a probable 5