Philippine Constitution embodied equal in the due itself, as process and jurisprudence, protection clauses of the Bill of the protection right to life is part of customary law, even absent a treaty or domestic law operationalizing Rights. for the domestic the same in law. In Philippine jurisprudence, the right to life has been explained as forming part Treaties of international customary law. These self-executing—requiring have cases action been included in on are generally for their regarded no further validity within arbitrary deprivation of life, the writ of Philippine jurisdiction. amparo, exceptional cases, it the treaty and other protections of the possible right. provide In cases bearing Razon v. on the Tagitis International Convention for Protection of All Persons from Disappearance even is or very however itself may through executive a act. the The Philippines has a long tradition in the law and practice international Enforced though In for its application legislative right to life, applied that are treaties. the of honoring obligations It is most accepted its under that a Philippines is not a party to the treaty. treaty assumes a double character, as The a Court declared proscription against that the source of international obligations and as domestic law. enforced disappearances, relating as it is to the right to life, is part of the corpus of this For general international as it is principle a of international principle of law international customary law. Oon the whole, under Philippine 4] the Philippines to renege obligations treaties is to domestic law. also on its under disregard its