National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea of home-returning benefits such as tax reduction and exemption, funding support, and personnel support while it does not have any provisions for the exclusion of benefits for those Korean foreign direct investment firms which have done human rights violations overseas. In response, the Commission expressed its opinion to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy on June 13, 2013. In detail, the Commission proposed that those foreign direct firms, in case they have done human rights violations overseas, should be excluded from the benefits for home-returning by law. The criteria for the selection of beneficiaries, the Commission added, should be stipulated by the Presidential Decree. In addition, the Commission proposed that the bill should be revised to provide for examinations of the status of human rights violations by Korean foreign direct investment firms overseas before the selection of beneficiaries. The Commission added that such prior examinations will clearly show if those home-returning companies have violated the provisions of the related statutes. 2) Investigation on Human Rights Conditions and Key Findings □ Investigation on human rights violations by Korean foreign direct investment firms and study on the improvement of related laws The press and civil society organizations have repeatedly brought into question the human rights violations by Korean foreign investment firms. In response, the NHRCK conduct an investigation to have an understanding of the status of the violations and to propose the Chapter 1. Improvement of Laws and Regulations, Institution, Policies, and Practices ▪▪▪ 91