Objectives There are four key proposed objectives of the discussion paper: • • • A review and analysis of relevant policy and academic literature to understand what constructive accountability means in an Ao Māori context. Examine and identify models and case studies of accountability mechanisms adopted in an Ao Māori context. Explore potential institutional arrangements and the adoption of a Māori housing entity or body with key responsibilities and powers. • Present key findings and recommendations for a broader scope of work based on the literature, which may also highlight the learnings of accountability within iwi/hapū/ marae and Māori organisations. This scope of work is led and facilitated by an independent researcher in collaboration with the Ahi Kaa team at the Human Rights Commission and will include further discussions with other key parties and stakeholders who play a significant role in the housing system for Māori. Framing the approach and identifying the barriers to address Literature and dialogue on Te Ao Māori concepts identify well-recognised and extensively implemented cultural procedures for accountability. The main accountability concept, tikanga Māori, is part of a broader and integrated understanding of behaviour, responsibilities and obligations that apply flexibly within the community in specific contexts. This is addressed as accountability in terms of Te Tiriti, considering a range of models. Examples of the models illustrate the different directions (horizontal and vertical) of accountabilities. Case studies and mechanisms of accountability are intended to provide further perspectives. The new Māori Health Authority model is considered as a structural model for 10 enabling greater accountability and compliance with Te Tiriti in the housing sector. Options are developed for a mooted independent Māori housing entity or body that could assure tino rangatiratanga and accountability by Māori to Māori as well as alternative institutional structures. The barriers identified through the adoption of this framework need to be addressed. Barriers that appear to arise from lack of trust by the Treaty partner at all levels and concern or rejection of power sharing are an opportunity to explore solutions. The findings provide direction for further investigations of relationships to address the barriers as well as the implementation of recommended options to achieve equitable access to decent homes. Te Kāhui Tika Tangata New Zealand Human Rights Commission Housing Inquiry