Komnas HAM, Indonesia LOIPR ICCPR 20 years and one of them was 82 years old. The Criminal Code Bill stipulates an article that needs to be evaluated and assessed to change the sentence for those who have served 10 years of waiting period. Komnas HAM, based on a study of this waiting period, has obtained expert information and observed the factual situation, assessing that a five-year period is sufficient for evaluation and assessment, and that a ten-year period is considered too long. List of issues: 1) How does Indonesia make an action plan to abolish certain provisions of the law that stipulate death penalty, including efforts to review the Criminal Code Bill to ensure the abolition of death penalty? 2) How does Indonesia guarantee the implementation of fair trials in accordance with the principles of fair trials? 3) How are the supervision and imposition of sanctions for violations by judicial officials carried out, and to what extent have these sanctions been imposed in recent years? 4) How can the evaluation and assessment policy for the 10-year waiting period be changed to 5 years in accordance with the results of the Komnas HAM’s study? 5) Can Indonesia implement a moratorium on the death penalty, while legally abolishing capital punishment? Explain the plan and procedure for this. b. Freedom of Religion and Belief 18. Komnas HAM received 74 public complaints regarding alleged violations of the right to freedom of religion and belief in 2014, 87 in 2015, 97 in 2016, 21 in 2017, 21 in 2018, and 23 in 2019. The victims were made up of individuals or groups of various adherents of religions and beliefs, including Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Kaharingan. Meanwhile, the perpetrators were either individuals, groups, or government officials. These series of incidents related to freedom of religion can be divided into three categories: prohibition or destruction of houses of worship resulting from the Joint Ministerial Decree; enforcement of the blasphemy provision by the state and the persecution of non-mainstream religious groups as experienced by the Ahmadiyya, Shia, and Gafatar communities, and; application of the blasphemy provision with the use of mass mobilization. The third case happened to Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, who was sentenced to two years in prison by the North Jakarta District Court in 2017 and Meiliana, who was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment by the Medan District Court for complaining about the volume of the Mosque speaker in Tanjung Balai, North Sumatra, in 2018. The third category also intersects with freedom of opinion and expression, in which a person would be silenced by the threat of the blasphemy provision. 19. There are still regulations that contradict the right to freedom of religion and belief, such as Presidential Decree No. 1 of 1965 concerning Prevention of Religious Abuse and/or Blasphemy (Law No. 1/PNPS/1965) and Law on Prosecution Service that regulates BAKORPAKEM (Coordinating Board for the Monitoring of Community Religious Groups). BAKORPAKEM was formed through the Attorney General's Decree No. KEP108/JA/5/1984 based on Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 and currently also refers to the Law on Prosecution Service. 20. In 2018, the High Prosecutor’s Office of Special Capital Region of Jakarta launched the Smart Pakem application to monitor religious beliefs and groups deemed "deviant". This 4