Part II: Preventing torture: NHRIs in action places of detention. NHRIs should also monitor the functioning of NPMs, their independence and their effectiveness. Insights from practice: In France, the designation of the Ombudsman (Médiateur de la République) was initially considered as an option for the NPM. However, in 2007, the decision was made to create an entirely new body to carry out the NPM mandate: the General Inspector of Places of Detention (Contrôleur général des lieux de privation de liberté). The Inspector is in regular dialogue with other relevant bodies and has signed an agreement with the Ombudsman that aims to clarify the division of tasks and avoid duplication. KEY POINTS: CHAPTER 10 • NHRIs can play an important role to promote the OPCAT, by advocating for ratification and participating in broad and inclusive consultations on NPM designation. • NHRIs may be designated as the NPM; either as the sole NPM, in cooperation with civil society organisations or as one of several NPMs. This double mandate can present particular opportunities and challenges for NHRIs. • NHRIs designated as NPMs can have direct and confidential contact with the SPT in the context of the SPT visit to the country and in its advisory role. • NHRIs not designated as the NPM can contribute to the work of the NPM and the work of the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture. FURTHER READING NPM Toolkit, Association for the Prevention of Torture Preventing torture: the role of National Preventive Mechanisms. A practical guide. Professional Training Series No. 21; OHCHR (2018) Guidelines on national preventive mechanisms, Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, Cat/OP/12/5 (2010) 141