Part II: Preventing torture: NHRIs in action Specific: each recommendation should address only one specific issue Measurable: the evaluation of the implementation should be as easy as possible Achievable: each recommendation should be realistic and feasible Results-oriented: the actions suggested should lead to a concrete result Time-bound: it should include a realistic timeframe AND Solution-suggestive: Wherever possible, recommendations should propose credible solutions Mindful of prioritization, sequencing and risks: it might be useful to address more urgent recommendations first and reserve others for subsequent reports Argued: recommendations should be based on high-quality, objective evidence and analysis and refer to standards Real-cause responsive: recommendations should address the cause of the problem, rather than the symptoms Targeted: recommendations should be directed to specific institutions/actors rather than to “the authorities” In practice, it might be difficult to draft recommendations that comply with all the double SMART criteria. However, NHRIs should take sufficient time to consider them carefully. Drafting good recommendations is essential as it provides a solid basis for an ongoing dialogue with the authorities and enables NHRIs to follow-up on their implementation. 3.2 Follow-up strategies In addition to sending visit reports to the persons in charge and higher authorities, NHRIs can present them to the staff and management of the place visited to establish a dialogue on implementation. In addition, meetings with several heads of institutions on thematic or transversal issues could also be organised. Finally, NHRIs can establish regular dialogues with high-level authorities on the implementation of recommendations issued in visit reports. 3.3. Annual report NHRIs are usually required to present an annual report of their activities to the Parliament. Annual reports provide an opportunity for the NHRI to summarize its key human rights concerns and present recommendations requiring legislative intervention. Annual reports can also draw attention to concerns regarding the treatment of detainees and conditions of detention. The annual report should be made available to the media and, more broadly, to the general public. 119