a) Produce a working IP agenda which technical working groups (TWG) within the partnerships may address; as the need arises or as the feedback mechanism calls for; urgent concerns in the area of extrajudicial executions of IP rights defenders; b) Foster a culture of accountability and good impact through IP-generated Monitoring and Evaluation mechanisms for the agencies to adopt and which the CHR’s Regional offices can validate generating periodical validation reports; c) Develop more mechanisms responsive to the needs of IPs for the protection and promotion of IP Rights such as: i. Mediation and arbitration services in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) between IP and Non-IP entities like government, civil society, business and/or migrant settlers; ii. providing community assistance in accessing government programs/ development funds such as the Green Climate Fund; iii. providing a website venue (online database system) for IP to share their success stories, difficulties and facilitate direct communications and partnering between and among themselves; and d) To build a databank of reliable data from primary sources to help inform policy and academic research to craft better programmatic interventions for the IPs and their Ancestral Domains. Guidelines will have to mark the parameters of the three level engagements but as the entire CHR migrates to Human Rights Observatory (HRO) work these efforts will provide a modelling function for other CHR divisions such as those involved in gender; children; conflict and Internal displacement; climate change; political detainees and jail management; migrant workers, etc. IV. Key Findings & Discussions 1. Joint Administrative Order No. 1 Series of 2012 constitutes a violation of IP rights to be awarded Certificates of Ancestral Domain Titles (CADT) that sets the metes and bounds of their domains and allows them to assert rights within those boundaries against those operating to deny them the exercise of priority rights in developing said domains JAO 1, Series of 2012 came about when the Land Registration Authority (LRA) refused to register CADTs/CALTs unless the NCIP, DAR or DENR issued the corresponding certificate of nonoverlap. The intention of the agencies in implementing JAO1 is to ensure that private land titles are segregated prior to the registration of CADTs/CALTs. IPRA respects titles already extant within Ancestral Domains as of November 22, 1997 when IPRA came into effect recognizing Native Titles all over the country, to wit: “Sec. 56. Existing Property Rights Regimes. Property Rights within the ancestral domains already existing and/or vested upon effectivity of this Act shall be recognized and respected.” Page | 11