ร าย งานผล การ ปฏิ บั ติ งานค ณะกร รม การสิ ท ธิ ม นุษ ยชน แ ห่ ง ชา ติ ประ จำ � ปี ง บประ ม า ณ พ .ศ. 25 6 5
18
two issues, the NHRCT has coordinated
with both the administrative and legislative
branches for support of amendment to
the law. Thirdly, concerned agencies did
not provide information to the NHRCT
on whether they had implemented
the recommendations in the country’s
human rights situation assessment report.
The law requires that they implement
promptly the recommendations as
appropriate. If they cannot do so or need
more time to do so, they must inform the
NHRCT of the reasons as provided for by
the law. Although government agencies
responded to the report, their response
mostly consisted of explanations about
their actions and achievements rather than
informing the NHRCT of their actions based on
the recommendations. The Cabinet should,
therefore, instruct government agencies and
state organizations to give importance to
implementing recommendations in
the report. In cases where it is not possible
to do so, the reasons should be reported
to the NHRCT for analysis and improvement
of the recommendations.