Decisions by ground The following diagram shows all decisions, whether relating to Part 1A or Part 2, made by reference to the alleged prohibited grounds, as a percentage.9 6% 8% Race Victimisation 3% Age 6% 4% Sexual harassment Sex 3% Ethnic / national origins 6% Religious belief 33% Disability 24% Family status 6% 1% Political opinion Director’s Privacy Act functions Racial harassment The Director also has powers, duties and functions under the Privacy Act 1993. Significantly, the Director may bring privacy interference proceedings upon referral from the Privacy Commissioner. The Director made two decisions on referrals from the Privacy Commissioner this reporting year, bringing proceedings in both cases. Another matter referred by the Privacy Commissioner was subsequently settled promptly, so the Director was not required to decide whether to bring proceedings. The Director also made 29 decisions on invitations to intervene in proceedings before the Tribunal. There were no interventions. 9 46 See n 3. Human Rights Commission