Series of Places of Detention Assessment Reports (02) rate of the standard of equipment and infrastructure of the CRC was 3.4, which reflects a weak compliance with the international standards as follows: • The CRC’s compliance rate for the provisions related to the infrastructure and inmates’ accommodation facilities in the CRC was 3.5, reflecting a weak compliance with the international standards. • The CRC’s compliance rate in regards to services facilities in the CRC was 3.2, which reflects a weak compliance with the international standards. The total rate of Ramallah CRC’s compliance in regards to the total rate of the standard of women’s detention centers was 2.4, which reflects compliance to some degree with the international standards. It should be noted that there were no juvenile inmates at the CRC at the time of the assessment. Remarks on the assessment results: • Administration of the CRC: The Ramallah CRC complies well with the international standards for prison administration in terms of the availability of documented policies, directions and instructions on the CRC’s administration. However, the ratio of staff to inmates is only 30.6% which is a low ratio, especially in light of the conditions of the building. There are vocational rehabilitation facilities in the CRC but they are not operational and there is no clear policy on managing and operating them. The CRC is not equipped to receive inmates and visitors with disabilities. In addition, there is no policy that determines the number of inmates’ working hours because work in all CRCs is a privilege and not compulsory. • Center’s staff: The Ramallah CRC complies well with the international standards for the staff of detention centers. However, there is no system or specific standards for incentives and penalties for the CRC’s staff who are paid the same as the rest of police staff without any additional allowances, nor is there an allowance for the nature of work. In addition, there are no clear or written criteria for appointing staff 48 INDEPENDENT COMMISSION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

Select target paragraph3