accused before public prosecution or the court as the case may be, and in other cases provided in the Law. And conciliation entails the end of the criminal suit, and it is for the public prosecution to order to cease the implementation of the punishment in case conciliation occurs during implementation. And in case the victims are multiple as a result of one criminal act, then the conciliation shall be of no effect in terms of the end of the criminal suit unless there is concurrence by all the victims. And in case the victims are multiple involving several crimes whether related to each other indivisibly or unrelated the conciliation will be of no effect except regarding the criminal suit concerning which conciliation was in effect.” 23. Moreover, the text of Article (21 bis [1]) after amendment: ““permissible for the accused or his special attorney to prove conciliation in violations whose penalty is a fine, and offenses punishable by a fine or imprisonment for a period not in excess of six months. The proof of conciliation shall be with the report clerk or the public prosecution, provided that the accused pays the maximum limit of the fine decided for the punishment. And in case the criminal suit is referred to the competent court, it is permissible for the accused- in whatever condition that the suit is in- to prove conciliation prior to the rendering of a judgment, provided that he pays three-quarters of the maximum limit of the fine decided for the punishment. And the Minister of Justice and Islamic Affairs shall issue a decision specifying the party to be paid, and a consequence of the conciliation is the end of the criminal suit, and the end of the criminal suit has no consequence for the civil suit.” 23