152.4. In cases such as suspected abduc�on or even missing persons, early commencement of inves�ga�ons is of the essence. Therefore, the Panel is of the view that the manner in which the Police had commenced their inves�ga�ons into the disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh le� much to be desired. The Police’s Failure to Obtain CCTV Footage 54 55 56 57 152.5. Following the disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh, his family had been ac�vely looking for informa�on and assistance from the residents along Jalan SS4B/10, Kelana Jaya, Petaling Jaya to try to determine what actually happened to Pastor Raymond Koh on the day of the incident. On 15 February 2017, they managed to obtain CCTV footage from two (2) nearby houses along Jalan SS4B/10, Kelana Jaya, Petaling Jaya which par�ally showed the manner in which Pastor Raymond Koh was abducted. 152.6. The Police, on the other hand, failed to obtain any CCTV footage from the nearby houses along Jalan SS4B/10, Kelana Jaya. They merely claimed that “Ada CCTV di rumah yang berhampiran, tapi rumah tertutup, tak ada orang dan berulang kita pergi pun tak ada orang. Bila ada orang pula cakap itu dummy sahaja, bermacam-macam alasan.” 55 152.7. In the Public Inquiry, ASP Supari further tes�fied that although there were CCTVs installed along the route/highways that may have captured the movement of the vehicles along Jalan SS4B/10, Kelana Jaya, Petaling Jaya, 56 most of the said CCTVs were not func�oning. ASP Supari further tes�fied that he was unable to confirm the reason for the malfunc�oning of the CCTVs or as to how long the CCTVs had been out of order.57 Refer to page 37, 38 Notes of Proceeding dated on 19 October 2017. Refer to page 151 Notes of Proceeding dated on 2 November 2017. Refer to Exhibit 19 produced in the Public Inquiry. Refer to page 14-16 Notes of Proceeding dated on 13 November 2017. 55 PASTOR RAYMOND KOH incident on 13 February 2017. At the police sta�on, Roeshan again waited for another two (2) hours before he could do the photofit.54