skills, knowledge of family violence and personal integrity of potential candidates whilst ensuring
equal gender representation.
The Inquiry Commissioners were:
Maiava Iulai Toma, Ombudsman (Chairman);
Hon. Tolofuaivalelei Falemoe Leiataua, former Parliamentarian (Vice Chairman);
Tagaloatele Professor Peggy Dunlop, Professor of Pacific Studies, Auckland University of
Technology;
Leasiolagi Professor Malama Meleisea, former Director for Samoa Studies, National University
of Samoa; and
Falenaoti Mulitalo June Kolotita Ailuai Oloiali’i, Active Community Member and Women’s
Village Representative of Vavau.
The Commissioners were supported by a number of staff members from the NHRI and volunteers
throughout the Inquiry process.
3.4
Methodology
Evidence for the Inquiry was collected through four different methods:
i.
Research: It was carried out throughout the Inquiry process by Inquiry staff and partners. This
involved the collection and analysis of data, media articles, case studies, reports and
programmes relating to family violence.5
ii.
Consultations:6 The Inquiry staff embarked on a three-phase consultation process with the
following stakeholders:
Phase 1: Relevant NGOs, Government ministries, development partners and the media.
Discussions focused on obtaining information on the work done and currently being
undertaken to address family violence in Samoa, and to identify areas for improvement.
Phase 2: Community bodies. The objectives of these consultations were to, identify possible
witnesses to tell their stories during the public or private hearings; gain the support of village
bodies to spread awareness of the Inquiry; and encourage members of the community to
attend the village consultations which followed. In addition, views on the nature and
prevalence of family violence within respective communities and possible solutions were also
sought.
Phase 3: Villages. Consultations sought to encompass all villages in Samoa and the
involvement of as many relevant village institutions as possible. It was to ensure there was
universal access to the Inquiry and every interested person had the opportunity to put forward
their opinions and convey their experiences.
5
A full list of evidence considered by the Inquiry can be found at Appendix F and the anthology of all documents can be
accessed in full via www.ombudsman.gov.ws.
6 For more information refer to “Stakeholder Consultations Report.” Document 58 Inquiry anthology, accessible at
www.ombudsman.gov.ws.