the its effect of de facto denial of women’s right to access the whole range of reproductive health services and information; 24. For LGUs with existing MCHN ordinances penalizing home births to amend the same by removing penalties and fines, and instead provide incentives for facility based deliveries and for LGUs contemplating the enactment of a MNCHN ordinance to avoid criminalization, and instead provide incentives for facility based compliance; 25. For LGUs to exercise political will in the implementation of RH, specifically by complying with DILG memorandum circular 2015-145 reiterating the roles of LGUs in the implementation of RPRH law; intensified information dissemination on RH, with balanced and accurate information on both natural and modern FPO methods; providing standardized allowances for Barangay Health Workers; filling up plantilla positions for public health workers in the LGUs and prioritizing regularization of contract health service providers/workers; establishing community based monitoring of the RPRH law and cooperating fully with the RITs in the monitoring of RPRH in their jurisdictions; establishing health centers in far flung areas to ensure access to health services; For the Supreme Court and Lower Courts 26. To consider conducting a study and/or review of the “Imbong vs. Ochoa” and the TRO on Implanon vis-à-vis the State’s Commitment under CEDAW, particularly women’s access to reproductive health. 27. To ensure that the justice system is gender sensitive and responsive to the intersecting vulnerabilities of women from marginalized sector and in specific vulnerable situations through continuous training of judges and personnel in all levels of the judiciary and to ensure accessibility of Courts for women with disability including the provision of sign language interpreters, local language translators, and the adoption of protocols in cases of persons with diverse SOGIE; 40