Komnas HAM, Indonesia LOIPR ICCPR 65. Komnas HAM assessed the ongoing situation of impunity that lasted a long time due the lack of independence, impartiality, and professionalism in law enforcement. This is evident from the law enforcement of gross human rights violations, which are strongly influenced by political interests. 66. The following table lists events of Gross Violations of Human Rights and the time of submission to the Attorney General: List of Issues: 1) What efforts have been made by the government to resolve gross violations of human rights as a guarantee of the right to justice for victims? 2) How will a gross violation of human rights case be resolved without impunity? 67. Some regional governments have taken the initiative to start restoring the rights of victims of gross human rights violations. For example, this was done by the Palu City Government. This mechanism was replicated by several other regional governments. Nevertheless, this initiative is still limited. 68. The longer the resolution of gross violations of human rights, the more victims will suffer. Justice will be delayed, as is the victim’s right to remedy. Until now, efforts to fulfill the rights of victims of gross human rights violations are still far from the expectations of the public and victims. Issue: What has the government done to restore the rights of victims of gross human rights violations? k. Criminal Justice System in Countering Terrorism 69. On June 21, 2018, Law No. 5 of 2018 concerning Eradication of Criminal Act of Terrorism was passed. Currently the government is proposing a Presidential Regulation on the Duties of the Indonesian National Army in Countering Terrorism. Law No.5 of 2018 and the draft Presidential Regulation are problematic as they add to the paradigm of counterterrorism from the criminal justice system and war model. This is reflected in the regulation of military involvement in the handling of criminal act of terrorism 15