Part 3 | Key Activities In 2022, the organizations that received the most recommendations in human rights cases were educational institutions with 124 cases, followed by the Police with 56 cases, multipleperson protection facilities with 53 cases, local governments with 51 cases, and businesses and other profit-oriented organizations with 50 cases. The cumulative acceptance rate of recommendations was 88.3%. Notably, the recommendation acceptance rates by the prosecution, police, National Intelligence Service, multiple-person protection facilities, and immigration authorities were all 100%. Emergency Remedies The Commission has the authority to take urgent remedial measures established under Article 48 of the NHRCK Act when there is a significant likelihood that human rights violations or discriminatory acts, if left unaddressed, may result in irreparable harm. In 2022, the Commission issued emergency relief recommendations in two cases that were presented for urgent remedial actions. The first case involved the Police taking no action to prevent disruptions during the regular Wednesday protests that address the issue of “comfort women” during the Japanese colonial period. The second case was related to secondary Suo Motu Investigations According to Article 30 (3) of the NHRCK Act, even in the absence of a petition, the Commission has the authority to initiate an investigation if there is reasonable evidence to believe that there are human rights violations or discriminatory acts of significant importance. In 2022, the Commission made the decision to initiate seven suo motu investigations and concluded six cases, including two cases carried over from the previous year. Remedial measures were taken in all six cases. On-site Inspections According to Article 24 (1) of the NHRCK Act, the Commission has the authority to conduct on-site inspections of detention and protection facilities if deemed necessary. 109 Part 3 | Key Activities victimization of a survivor of sexual assault in the Air Force.