Decisions by ground The following diagram shows all decisions, whether relating to Part 1A or Part 2, made by reference to the alleged prohibited grounds involved in the complaints, as a percentage.41 Victimisation 9% Race 6% Age 6% Sexual Harassment 12% Sex 15% Disability 25% Ethnic/National Origins 21% Religious Belief 6% The Director’s Privacy Act functions The Director also has powers, duties and functions under the Privacy Act 1993. Significantly, the Director may bring privacy interference proceedings upon referral from the Privacy Commissioner. The Director made three decisions on referrals from the Privacy Commissioner this reporting year. He decided to join one party to extant proceedings and to bring proceedings in the remaining two matters. The Director also made 25 decisions on invitations to intervene in proceedings before the Tribunal pursuant to reg 1442 of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002. There were no interventions. 41 See n 37. 42 Reg 14 of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002 requires the Tribunal to serve on the Director any statement of claim filed under the Privacy Act 1993 and ask whether the Director will elect to intervene under s 86 of that Act. Annual Report 2019 55