ƒ How old is the product, and how long do similar products normally last? ƒ Was the product sold new or second‑hand? ƒ Has the product been used in a way it wasn’t designed for?239 The fit for purpose guarantee is also highly relevant as this guarantee applies when: ƒ a consumer tells a business they want to use a product for a particular purpose ƒ the consumer buys the product based on the advice of the business ƒ the business advertises in any way that the product can be used for a particular purpose.240 Where a supplier or manufacturer fails to meet a guarantee, such as acceptable quality or fitness for purpose, the remedy may be repair, replacement or refund and/or compensation for damages and loss.241 Obviously, replacement parts and expertise need to be available for consumers to avail themselves of repairs. A concern when it comes to neurotechnology is the availability of these remedies if the supplier goes into liquidation (as discussed above in respect of people with disability). While there may be a consumer guarantee that replacement parts are available within a reasonable amount of time, a consumer might be left with a degrading piece of technology in their body on which they have come to rely but which may not be able to be repaired. Further, under the consumer guarantees, suppliers of recreational services can exclude, limit or modify liability, when they do not meet the legal expectations to provide services: ƒ with due care and skill ƒ fit for any particular purpose ƒ within a reasonable time (when no time is set). Such suppliers may only limit their liability for death or personal injury, including illness (mental or physical), but not for property loss.242 Liability for reckless conduct by the supplier cannot be excluded.243 Given the likelihood that neurotechnology may be used for recreational services that could, if not provided with due care and skill, cause mental harm, consumer guarantees are unlikely to be a suitable regulatory tool to regulate these products. 32 The consumer guarantees allows consumers to take action against suppliers to enforce their rights. However, litigation is expensive and complex which can be a barrier to justice, particularly when opposing a well‑resourced business. Consumers would be unlikely to have the technical knowledge around neurotechnologies to confidently assert their consumer guarantees rights. The ACL also prohibits businesses from engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct, and from making false or misleading representations.244 To comply with the ACL requirements, neurotechnology suppliers need to ensure that they provide clear and accurate information to consumers through their marketing, product labelling, and in any other way they engage with consumers to promote and supply their products. The ACL also contains the product safety provisions which apply to all consumer goods and product related services supplied in Australia. The ACL’s primary regulatory powers for product safety are mandatory safety and information standards, compulsory product recalls and interim or permanent bans.245 The ACL regulatory framework for the safety of general consumer goods does not contain the full suite of tools needed to effectively regulate specific types of products because they require a tailored approach. Specific types of products are regulated by specialist product safety regulators, which can provide that tailored approach as well as in‑depth technical expertise, and ongoing focus needed to manage the unique risks associated with specific products. While the ACL does allow the relevant Commonwealth Minister to make a mandatory safety standard,246 the safety regulation of consumer‑oriented neurotechnologies is likely to need technical expertise in neuroscience, biometrics, and BCIs. A generalist product safety regime like the ACL may not be able to provide this type of expertise or ongoing focus to monitor compliance (as opposed to a general consumer goods like a trampoline). Given the potential for neurotechnology to monitor and/or intervene in neural activity and the inherently unknown risks of harm to the individual and likely profound impacts Protecting Cognition: Background Paper on Human Rights and Neurotechnology

Select target paragraph3