4 Output: Education, promotion and advocacy Outputs4 Publish case studies of effective solutions, including solutions from young people, that have resulted in reduced unemployment for young people with disabilities, young people living in economic decile 1–3 areas of South Auckland and in one work-poor rural community Outcome area 1: Work and education Results Performance measure Standard 2013–14 Quantity Number of case studies Minimum of 2 Quality Case studies meet quality measure of participation and accuracy, as assessed by a survey circulated to contributors At least 75% of respondents report that they are satisfied that their initiatives have been accurately represented The case studies are regarded as valuable by dutybearers, as recorded in the Commission’s impact register The impact register records at least 5 private or public sector agencies provided feedback that the case studies are of value or great value The Commission released an online resource – The right to work: maximising the employment potential of young New Zealanders – which contains six case studies. The case studies highlight effective youth employment initiatives in South Auckland, the Far North and for young disabled people. In addition to being released online the case studies were sent to a targeted group of organisations, agencies and individuals who are involved with or concerned about youth unemployment. The performance standard required a minimum of two case studies. Organisations profiled in the case studies were asked to indicate their 4 Annual Report 2014 The scale of the products and services in this output area has been determined by available capacity. The standards for each output have been determined based on historical trends. Qualitative feedback and recorded observations triangulated with survey results has indicated that products and services in this output area are consistently regarded by participants as valuable or very valuable. Inevitably, given the contestable nature of the content and as evidenced through results to date, there will always be a percentage (0–25%) of participants who will not indicate that a programme has been of value or great value to them, irrespective of the quality of the programme. Consequently, standards for this output area are set at a range of 70–80% participants who rate the output of value or great value to them. There are no readily available comparable domestic or international standards and measures. 45