सव भव तु सिखनः ु Annual Report 2022-23 The complainant later confirmed the se lement, withdrew her complaint, and informed NHRC accordingly. The police report denied all allega ons, asser ng the complainant's se lement with the factory owner for rupees three lakh and closure of the case. The Commission, on 13 April 2022, closed the ma er. 2.) Rape of a minor SC girl in District Ajmer, Rajasthan (Case No. 1738/20/1/2020- WC) The complainant stated that a minor SC girl, aged 16 years, was raped by many accused persons including uncle of the vic m girl. The school principal of vic m girl also a empted to rape her in the school. The accused persons con nued raping the girl over a long period of me and finally when the mother of girl came to know, FIR was registered in the month of May, 2020, but the complainant alleged that the police did not arrest any of the accused so far and they were conduc ng biased inves gaon as the accused persons had contacts with local poli cians. A report dated 17 February 2022 of the Addi onal Superintendent of Police, CB-CID, Range Cell, Ajmer, Rajasthan, was submi ed by the D. I. G of Police (AHT), CBCID, Jaipur, Rajasthan, vide le er dated 24 February 2022. It was reported that the instant case related to FIR No. 133/2020, which was registered at P.S. Javaja, Ajmer, U/sec. 323/ 341/ 504/ 376/ 376(2)(n)/ 376D IPC and Sec on 3/ 4/ 16/ 17 POCSO Act along with Sec on 3(2 )(va) SC/ST Act. A er the comple on of the inves ga on, charge sheet no. 02/2021 was submi ed before the Hon'ble Court. An amount of rupees one lakh was sanconed for payment as compensa on to the vic m of the case. The allega on against the principal was not substan ated during enquiry. During enquiry of the case bearing no. 91 / 202 1, U/ Sec. 332/ 353/ 504/ 506/ 34 IPC and Sec on 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2) (va) SC/ST Act, which was filed by the principal, it was found that the said principal was assaulted by the rela ves of the vic m and the instant complaint was filed by the father of the complainant in order to create pressure upon the said principal. The accused was also arrayed as an accused in the case bearing FIR No. 328/2020, in which the accused and the vic m of the case are the same as in FIR No. 133/2020. The charge sheet was also submi ed in the case bearing FIR No. 328/2020. 66 The Commission considered the report submi ed by the authority in the instant case. Since the chargesheet was submi ed against the accused for commi ng the offences U/ Sec. 323/ 341/ 504/ 376/ 376 (2)(n)/ 376D IPC and Sec on 3/ 4/ 16/ 17 POCSO Act along with Sec on 3(2) (va) SC/ST Act before the Hon'ble Court, the Superintendent of Police, Ajmer, Rajasthan and District Magistrate, Ajmer, Rajasthan, were directed to submit report with regard to payment of compensa on to the vic m of the case as per the vic m compensa on scheme of the State, SC/ST Act and as per DLSA of the State. Neither complainant's comments nor report from Supdt. of Police and District Magistrate, Ajmer was received. In the interest of jus ce, the copy of report already received was transmi ed once again to the complainant for her comments, if any, within four weeks. Meanwhile, requisite report regarding the payment of compensa on was called once again from Supdt. of Police and District Magistrate, Ajmer, Rajasthan. The complainant vide a communica on dated 03 September 2021 approached the Com- mission sta ng that the local police colluded with one of the main accused in the instant gang rape case by allegedly accep ng heavy amount of bribe from him and gave him a clean chit in the charge sheet. It is further stated that the police managed to implicate the father of the vic m in a false case and sent him to jail for about 10 days with the objec ve to mount pressure on him for not to press upon the inclusion of the name of the main accused/school headmaster as an accused during the inves ga on. It is further stated that the police deliberately failed to upload the FIR of the vic m in the portal for the purpose of releasing the statutory monetary compensa on under the SC/ST Act and rules framed there under and on account of that the vic m did not receive any compensaon so far in the instant case. The complainant asked the Commission for a high-level probe so as to ensure jus ce and fair deal in the ma er. In the light of above, the Commission directed the DGP, Rajasthan, to conduct further enquiry into the ma er in view of the allega on of the complainant and get the ma er reinves gated through CB-CID by exercising his powers u/s 173 (8) Cr.P.C. It was observed that no comments were received from the complainant. The Commis- Chapter 7 - Thematic Areas