4. Conclusions and Recommendations Conclusions      Komnas HAM has carried out the SDGs activities in accordance with its objectives, functions, duties, and authorities, including based on the seven strategic issues of Komnas HAM for 2020-2024. The role of Komnas HAM in encouraging the achievement and monitoring of the SDGs has not been explicitly identified in the 2020 Annual Report of the National Commission on Human Rights, making it difficult for external parties more specifically the government and the community to know whether Komnas HAM has carried out its role in supporting the SDGs achievement that is linked to human rights more broadly. Komnas HAM has the authority to optimize supervision over the implementation of the SDGs achievements from a human rights perspective on various types and forms of activities presented in the 2020 Annual Report of the National Commission on Human Rights. Internal optimization of the SDGs is needed to synergize Komnas HAM’s performance in relation to the SDGs, while external aspects are required. Thus, the stakeholders understand the position of Komnas HAM regarding the SDGs. Komnas HAM needs to continue to make efforts to mainstream human rights in the process and support towards the implementation as well as the SDGs achievements. It should be underlined that although the goals, targets, and indicators of the SDGs reflect the protection and fulfillment of human rights, in the process of achieving them, they are not necessarily in line with human rights principles and norms. The strategic role and position of Komnas HAM are to ensure that the process and implementation of the SDGs achievement are in line with human rights. One of the activities to achieve this is by making use of the SDGs monitoring instruments prepared by Komnas HAM and UNESCO and encouraging the implementation of the Standard Norms and Settings by Ministries, Agencies, and Local Governments. 26