National Human Rights Commission of Korea Annual Report 2021
reason that an associated trial is ongoing on the matter of fact of the petition. However, it expressed
the above opinion based on conclusion that suspending the construction without any other clear
reasons than unilateral civil complaints that were driven by prejudice against Muslims and the
Islam religion is not a justifiable reason.
Meanwhile, regarding a petition that the district office’s failure to take actions on illegal
advertisement such as resident banners containing hate speech against Islam, the Commission
concluded that failure to take actions on banners that contain expressions of discrimination and
violence against Muslims, such as “Muslims kill people cruelly by beheading,” “devil religion that
kills people,” “terrorists,” and “war command post,” constitutes infringement upon the dignity,
values, and personal rights of the petitioner and members of the petitioning organization. It thus
recommended that the head of the district office remove or take the necessary actions against
racially discriminating advertisement, the use of which even during legitimate, reported rallies is
prohibited under the Outdoor Advertisement Act.
The district office accepted the Commission’s recommendation and submitted a plan to conduct
a crackdown on racially discriminating banners related to the mosque construction from October
2021. Meanwhile, in a lawsuit seeking cancellation of the construction suspension order, the court
recognized the unlawfulness of the order and ruled in favor of the plaintiff.
H. Opinion expressed on proposed partial amendment to the Act
on Press Arbitration
Regarding the proposed partial amendment to the Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies for
Damage Caused by Press Reports, which is currently pending at the National Assembly, the
Commission expressed opinion on September 13 to the Speaker of the National Assembly that,
while it agrees with the proposal’s intent to increase accountability of the press, careful review is
necessary prior to legislation as some of the new provisions may shrink press freedom guaranteed
under the Constitution.
With fake news and disinformation becoming a serious social problem and while acknowledging
that the proposed amendment’s intent is to increase accountability of the press by calling to the
press attention the importance of reporting news truthfully, the Commission expressed the view
that, because the proposed stricter regulation on media activities has implications for the exercise
58