Key NHRCK Activities C. Detention Facilities ■ ‌Human rights violated due to forced withdrawal of petition The petitioner who is a prisoner filed a petition that he was forced to withdraw his petition and make a false statement on an official document. On July 22, the Commission recommended the Minister of Justice to take disciplinary actions against the petitionees and disseminate the case to ensure that the rights of prisoners are not violated. The Commission found that, after the petitioner's case was submitted to the relevant subcommittee for review, the petitionees called and coaxed the petitioner, and interviewed him several times to get the details of the petition. The petitioner had expressed his agony to the forced by the petitionees to write a letter to withdraw his petition and send it by postal mail. The Part 2 Commission and other inmates about the repeated, forced interviews, and the fact that he was Commission concluded that the repeated interviews by the petitionees violated the petitioner's with the Commission, limiting his voluntary decision and action. D. Multi-person Care Facilities ■ ‌Human rights violated due to disclosure of personal information of comfort woman by senior care facility On September 10, the Commission recommended the director of an institution that assists victims who had been forced to work in Japan's military brothels and the director of a related social welfare organization to take the necessary measures so that the name of the victim is not revealed, delete her data, and consult the level of information disclosure with the family of the deceased victim. An investigation by the Commission showed that the facilities had disclosed the victim's personal information in an aggressive promotional campaign, despite the request from the victim that her personal data not be disclosed to the public. The Commission recognizes that comfort women's account of their experiences can serve the public interest, but should they not want to be actively disclosed due to fears that such disclosure might do them and their families harm, 93 Key NHRCK Activities right of self-determination. It also saw them as an act to disrupt the petitioner’s communication

Select target paragraph3