information, among other considerations. In 46 cases (23.71%), no violations were found but the NHRCT did make recommendations to promote and protect human rights to the relevant agencies. Examples include: 1) In the case of a community in the Khlong San district being impacted by the construction of a hotel and commercial buildings under the RTWO project, the NHRCT recommends establishing a coordinating committee to assess and propose fair solutions to address and prevent the impact. Additionally, the committee should monitor the restoration efforts closely to compensate the affected residents for the damages they have incurred; and 2) In the case of a community in Pathum Thani province experiencing distress due to the necessity of relocating from long - term inhabited land with legitimate ownership documents, the NHRCT recommends that Pathum Thani Province, relevant local authorities, and the Community Organizations Development Institute (CODI) consider providing assistance to residents facing hardships. This assistance should align with the guidelines for addressing housing stability issues for low - income individuals in urban areas, such as the Secure Housing Project. The remaining 25 cases (12.89%) were either resolved by relevant authorities, withdrawn by the complainants, under court litigation, or concluded for other reasons. The NHRCT has monitored the progress of actions taken in response to the examination of 136 cases of alleged human rights violations. Out of these, 122 cases (89.71%) involved government or private sector agencies that fully or partially implemented the NHRCT’s recommendations. Noteworthy instances include: 1) In a case where the investigators of a certain provincial police station delayed the legal proceedings, the Royal Thai Police has resolved the issue, and the case file has been forwarded to the public prosecutor’s office for further action; 2) In the case of opposing the construction project of the Mae Lao Dam in the Chiang Kham district, Phayao province, the relevant authorities have canceled the project and developed guidelines for water management to maximize benefits and align with the geographical and social conditions of the area; and 3) In a case alleging that the Department of Land Transport did not permit people with mobility disabilities to obtain a public vehicle driver’s license, the relevant authorities have coordinated to invite the petitioner to participate in the examination for obtaining a public vehicle driver’s license. The petitioner has successfully passed the examination, resolving the matter; and etc. The NHRCT also concluded monitoring in 10 cases (7.35%) due to reasons such as cases that cannot be addressed based on ป ระจำ � ปี งบ ป ระมาณ พ.ศ . 2 5 6 6 17