the Directive on the Execution of Confinement in a Guardhouse and Standards for Treatment of Those Confined clearly stipulate that the disposition of confinement in a guardhouse shall not be notified to a third party when demanded as such by the subject of the disposition, and the disclosure of the details of disciplinary action is to be controlled and determined by the subject of such disciplinary action. Nonetheless, the charges against the petitioners' that led to their transfer and the details of the disposition were notified to their families against their will, and we concluded that this was a violation of the petitioners' privacy guaranteed in Article 17 of the Constitution. notify the petitioners' parents of their transfer considering the common practices of Korea, we concluded that it was reasonable to seek the improvement of such practices through on-the-job education rather than holding the petitionee liable. C. Detention Facilities Illegitimate Censoring of Letters and Punishment On August 29, we recommended that the Minister of Justice prevent the recurrence of censoring the letters of and punishing inmates on the grounds that they file petitions or their letters are addressed to press organizations and to cancel the decision of the facility to punish the petitioner concerning this specific case. This petition was filed after an inmate attempted to send a letter to a press organization about a case witnessed at the detention facility and the detention facility censored this letter, disapproved its dispatch on the grounds that it presented false information, and punished the inmate. We viewed that letters of inmates should be censored only when they are deemed to pose a justifiable threat and it should be strictly reviewed whether a case requires censoring as an exception. Based on these criteria, we concluded that it was illegitimate to censor the letter simply because it was addressed to a press organization and that it was a violation of the petitioner's right of action and communication guaranteed in Articles 10 and 17 of the Constitution for the petitionee to disapprove the dispatch of the letter and punish the petitioner as the letter arguing National Human Rights Commission of Korea Annual Report 2018 93 Part 2 | Commission's Major Activities However, as it can be flexibly viewed as an effort to serve as a responsible unit leader to