59. The main challenges in addressing the problem of IDPs in Papua are the unavailable data on IDPs and the unresponsiveness of the Central and Regional Governments. On the other hand, the security approach put forward by the Government of Indonesia has caused trauma for IDPs - especially since they come from conflict areas. In November 2021, Komnas HAM identified at least 2.086 people from three different districts in Maybrat fled to the jungle outside their districts due to the gunfire between the West Papua National Liberation Army (Tentara Pembebasan Nasional Papua Barat - TPNPB) and the security forces. In October 2022, the number tripled to 6.556 IDPs, spreading across Papua. 60. In July 2023, Komnas HAM conducted monitoring regarding the situation of the IDPs from Maybrat in Sorong Regency, South Sorong Regency, and Maybrat Regency. Komnas HAM noted that until July 2023, at least 3000 people still live in shelters in worrying conditions with deprived economic and social conditions. 61. Integrated and comprehensive data is needed to identify the basic rights of IDPs, both in shelters and after they return to their original places. The basic rights include public services, education, health facilities, and other rights deemed to be necessary. The Government of Indonesia must guarantee the right to security against the non-recurrence of events, recovery of the psychological and psychosocial of the IDPs, and the rebuilding of the damaged and destroyed buildings and houses. 62. Komnas HAM encourages the Government of Indonesia to establish an integrated and responsive mechanism between Central and Local Governments for handling the IDPs. M. Access to justice, independence of the judiciary, and fair trial (arts. 2 and 14) 63. Violation against access to justice often occurs at the early stage of legal processes, particularly during police investigations. Throughout 2020 to 2021, Komnas HAM dealt with 348 cases concerning violations of access to justice which were conducted by police. The forms of violation occurred in the form of restrictions on access to legal aid, unprofessional and unresponsiveness in receiving public reports, incomplete administrative stages of investigation including the arresting and detention process, and also discriminatory treatment in receiving public complaints. 64. The implementation of the Legal Aid Law for the people is currently underway. However, Komnas HAM still finds several problems regarding this issue, such as: a) the appointment of a legal representative without the

Select target paragraph3