Part 1A complaints by entity, ground and decision The table below shows the public-sector entities or type of public-sector entities complained against, the prohibited grounds of discrimination alleged in respect to those entities, and the Director’s decisions. Public Sector Entity Ground14 Decision District Health Board (2) Disability (2) No (2) Race (1) No (1) Family status (1) NFA15 (1) Disability (1) No (1) Disability (1) No (1) Race (1) NFA (1) Age (1) No (1) University/Educational Institute (3) New Zealand Police (1) Regional Councils (2) Ministry of Social Development (2) Department of Corrections (2) Ministry of Education (1) Ministry of Justice (3) Disability (2) No (1) Yes (1) Race (1) No (1) No jurisdiction (1) NFA (1) Political opinion (1) No (1) Age (1) Sexual orientation (2) No (1) RB16(1) Yes (1) Immigration New Zealand (1) Ethnic/national origins (1) No (1) Employment Relations Authority (1) Disability (1) No (1) Employment status (1) No (1) Disability (1) No (1) Sex (1) No (1) Office of the Privacy Commissioner (1) Disability (1) No (1) ACC (1) Disability (1) No (1) Age (1) No (1) Disability (1) No (1) Ethnic/national origins (1) Yes (1) Minister/Associate Minister/ Ministry of Health (3) Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment (3) Where an applicant has relied on several grounds, a single primary ground has been isolated. ‘NFA’ denotes that the Director decided to take no further action on the application. 16 ‘RB’ signifies a matter that the Director referred back to the Human Rights Commission to attempt alternative dispute resolution. 14 15 25