Article(s) of the CEDAW Provisions in the Constitution of India, Legislations, Policies, Reports, and Judgements - Right to protection for patients entering clinical trials etc.4 8. To encourage family planning, there are incentives in the form of monetary and other reliefs to women and men by different State governments. JUDGMENTS: 1. Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration: (2009) 11 SCC 409: The Supreme Court upheld women’s reproductive autonomy as a fundamental right including the reproductive rights of mentally challenged women. 2. Laxmi Mandal v. Deen Dayal Harinagar Hospital: W.P. (C) No. 8853/2008: The Delhi High Court upheld that the right to health includes the right to access and receive a minimum standard of treatment and care in public health facilities. 3. Sandesh Bansal v. Union of India; W.P. (C) 9061/2008: High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled that the primary duty of the Government is to ensure that all women survive pregnancy and childbirth. 4. Devika Biswas v. Union of India: (2016) 10 SCC 726: SC held that the freedom to exercise reproductive rights would include the right to make a choice regarding sterilization. 67 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women Gaps in the implementation of CEDAW in India (G) and its corresponding recommendations (R)