oppose the system of promoting human rights and the human rights itself by using hatred towards specific groups, such as LGBTI, foreigners, and certain religions. The various problems surrounding the human rights system of local governments are due to the lack of clear understanding and interpretation of the human rights system of local governments by the Korean society, including those involved, and the lack of efforts to confirm the normative basis. Administrative agencies recognize human rights organizations as means, rather than as partners, or as unnecessary obstacles, and the society that composes the Human Rights Committee mutually recognizes administrative agencies as objects of enlightenment, resulting in tension and conflict. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the performance and limitations of the regional system of promoting human rights over the past 10 years or longer, and to gain consensus among officials, public employees, and local residents about the importance, role, and method of the regional system of promoting human rights. The final task is to refine human rights ordinances based on past experiences and strengthen the human rights duties to make ‘human rights mainstream’ that emphasizes the value of human rights in all decision-making and administration related to the lives of the local residents. However, it is desirable to prepare explicit legal regulations so that the regional human rights system is not adversely affected by the disposition of the local heads or the external environment, rather than considering the retreat of the regional human rights system as simply a ‘conflict within the community.’ 277