PASTOR RAYMOND KOH
152.8.
The Panel is of the view that CCTV footage have been regularly relied on
by the police to solve crimes. The Police’s failure to obtain any CCTV
footage in rela�on to the incident along Jalan SS4B/10, Kelana Jaya,
Petaling Jaya shows that they lacked seriousness in the manner they
conducted their inves�ga�ons into the disappearance of Pastor
Raymond Koh. Their explana�on for this failure also fell short of the
standard that is reasonably expected of them. Further, the Police also
refused to reveal ini�ally that they have a control room at the Petaling
Jaya Police Sta�on and that Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya and Malaysia
Highway Authority had CCTVs under their control as well. This can be
seen as an a�empt to suppress informa��on by the Police on the
disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh.
Last Ping from Pastor Raymond Koh’s Mobile Phone
152.9.
In the Public Inquiry, Nazeri bin Mohamad (IW13) (“ASP Nazeri”)
tes�fied that ASP Supari had only requested him to locate the last
loca�on of Pastor Raymond Koh’s phone at about 12:00 a.m. on 14
February 2017, that is a�er almost twelve (12) hours a�er Roeshan had
lodged his police report on 13 February 2017 at 11:54 a.m.
152.10. Following that, ASP Nazeri further tes�fied that he informed ASP Supari
at about 12:45 a.m. on 14 February 2017 that the general final loca�on
of Pastor Raymond Koh’s phone was in the vicinity of Jalan SS25/25,
Taman Mayang, Petaling Jaya.58
152.11. The Panel is of the view that upon confirming the final loca�on of Pastor
Raymond Koh’s phone, the Police had failed to go to that area to make
a thorough search for Pastor Raymond Koh.
Peter Chong
152.12. The Panel is of the view that the Police were slow in carrying out
inves�ga�ons into leads that could have provided useful informa�on in
rela�on to the disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh. This is clear when
the Police had failed to thoroughly inves�gate the informa�on provided
by social ac�vist Peter Chong Fook Meng (IW9) (“Peter Chong”) who had
reported that he had received a Whatsapp message from an anonymous
58
Refer to page 10 Notes of Proceeding dated on 7 September 2018.
56