PASTOR RAYMOND KOH 79. In analysing the evidence available in Pastor Raymond Koh’s case, the Panel has adopted a more inclusive rather than exclusive approach. Hence, the Panel has inter alia, taken into considera�on hearsay, circumstan�al or presump�ve evidence when determining the cumula�ve effect of the evidence adduced in the Public Inquiry. Detailed Facts of the Disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh Direct Evidence 80. Based on the direct evidence available, the Panel has noted the following: 80.1. Susanna had tes�fied that on 13 February 2017 at about 8.45 a.m., Pastor Raymond Koh was with her and their son, Jonathan Koh Szu Hao (“Jonathan”) at their home in Prima Sixteen, 12-4 Chapter Two, Jalan 16/18, Sec�on 16, Petaling Jaya, Selangor. 80.2. Susanna further tes�fied that at about 10:15 a.m., Pastor Raymond Koh collected a jar of belacan from her at Puncak Damansara Condominium which he intended to give to his friend at the Harapan Komuni� Office at Jalan SS4C/1, Kelana Jaya, Selangor. 80.3. Roeshan, the eye witness of the incident tes�fied that at about 10:45 a.m. on the same morning, he witnessed three (3) black 4WD vehicles and two (2) cars, one of which was a gold Toyota Vios and two (2) motorcycles surrounding a car while he was driving along Jalan SS4B/10, Kelana Jaya in a residen�al neighbourhood. Subsequently, he saw a struggle between the driver of the car and a few other men who were dressed in black and wore black balaclavas. When Roeshan drove his car closer, an Indian man came up to Roeshan and directed him to “back off” from the scene. Following that, while Roeshan was reversing his car, he saw a Malay-looking man taking a video of the incident before all the men and the vehicles including the vic�m’s car were driven off. 80.4. Roeshan also tes�fied that as he was driving off from the scene, he no�ced there were sha�ered pieces of glass on the road as the driver’s window of the vic�m’s car was smashed. 80.5. Roeshan tes�fied that the en�re incident occurred in less than a minute. 30