Stakeholders expressed fear that the money and financial benefit generated from a tournament held on Māori land would flow overseas and tangata whenua would be left further disadvantaged. Stakeholders suggested for example that a mutually beneficial solution would see a portion of the funds raised being invested into the development of Māori football. • Lack of access to volunteering opportunities (that include cost recovery for participation costs such as travel, accommodation, meals etc) and paid employment opportunities. • Lack of engagement with people and organisations with lived experience of disability in the planning process. Bringing tangata whenua in too late into the process is a significant risk that stakeholders often see. If major decisions are made before tangata whenua are brought into the process, the likelihood of the above-mentioned risks occurring increases tremendously. • Inaccessible access to mechanisms for raising grievances or complaints. • Inadequate accessible transport from home to stadium or Fanfest zones. (d) Risks for children and young adults (c) Accessibility risks Children and young people are particularly vulnerable to having their human rights compromised. Accessibility for all, including disabled people or people with limited mobility is a key risk. This includes the accessibility of infrastructure and services at the tournament-related stadiums and other sites, as well as transport, tourism infrastructure and the public buildings and other spaces in the host country. The following risks were raised by stakeholders: • Lack of accessible communications about the tournament, including easy read materials, signing and captioning. • Inequitable access to ticketing, particularly where this is managed by third-party providers, lack of access to pre-sale or specially priced ticketing (noting that disabled people are likely to have lower incomes and therefore do not have equitable access to premium tickets). Extensive research and work at the state and national levels in Australia in recent years, including the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse70 (Royal Commission), has shone a spotlight on the vulnerabilities of children in institutional settings, including sports, to serious human rights violations. This is particularly the case where there is a power imbalance between adults and children, or children are isolated from others and with an adult alone or there is inadequate adult supervision. Much work has been undertaken in response to the findings of the Royal Commission, and more still remains to be done. The following initiatives are of particular importance: • Inequitable allocation of accessible seating within stadiums. Inequality and lack of choice, including sub-optimal seating allocations that impact line of sight. • No appropriate access to venues and seating including for the ‘last mile’ and lack of suitable facilities such as bathrooms and catering. • Lack of options for attendance by people with auditory sensitivities. • the development by the AHRC of the National Principles for Child Safe Organisations71 (National Principles) and the suite of tools and resources developed to support the principles72 • the work of Sport Integrity Australia with respect to child safeguarding73 • the ‘Keeping our Kids Safe’ resources74 developed to provide a cultural safety lens for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children in addition to the National Principles FIFA 2023 Women’s World Cup Human Rights Risk Assessment • 31