Komnas HAM, Indonesia LOIPR ICCPR 3) What is the arrangement of House of Representatives’ oversight team with regard to the handling of terrorism crimes in collaboration with institutions like Komnas HAM? 4) What is the official policy regarding the handling of Indonesian citizens in the ISIS region, and how does Indonesia carry out its international responsibility as a member of the UN Human Rights Council and UN Security Council in resolving these issues? l. General Elections 74. The results of Komnas HAM monitoring in 14 provinces in the organization of concurrent general elections on April 17, 2019, suggest indications of human rights violations, especially the right to vote, in which voters were required to present Electronic Identity Cards (KTP-el) and be domiciled in the electoral location for at least the last 6 months. Some of these problems were reported, among others, in Central Kalimantan, where only 85% or 1,753,224 voters were registered, and in East Java, where 4,000,000 remaining voters did not yet have a KTP-el 4. 75. The KTP-el ownership policy also has implications for the low fulfillment of voting rights for vulnerable groups, particularly: a. detainees and prisoners, as a result of not having a KTP-el and/or not being registered while serving a sentence. Such cases are reported from results of monitoring in North Sumatra, where around 20,089 out of 32,122 correctional facility residents lost their right to vote; in East Kalimantan, 3,789 were able to vote out of the total 27,809 residents; in East Java, 50% of the 14,562 residents in Porong Class I Correctional Facility and Medaeng Detention Centers were registered to vite); and in the Spc. Capital Region of Jakarta (Salemba Detention Center) only 1,480 detainees out of 4000 detainees were able to vote; b. Hospital patients and their families, with no special polling station being provided, depriving these people their voting rights. If there are any, it usually depends on the polling station in the neighboring areas, where mostly would allocate only one hour (12.00 PM - 01.00 PM) and 2.5% of the reserved ballots. This was the case in H Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, (out of the 200 patients, only 2 voted); Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital, Samarinda (the general elections organizer did not arrive); Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya (out of 1400 patients and 225 employees, only 215 people voted); Bekasi General Hospital (375 hospitalized patients, organizer did not come); St. Carolus Hospital (organizer did not come until 30 minutes before finish time) c. In general, persons with mental disabilities could not use their constitutional right to vote even though the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 135/PUU-XII/2015 and General Elections Commission (KPU) has lifted the prohibition for persons with mental disabilities to vote as long as they don’t have a doctor's certificate stating that they cannot use their right due to loss of consciousness. In reality, the Constitutional Court's decision has not been fully obeyed and differing interpretations were given. For example, 340 patients at Prof. Dr. M. Ildrem Mental Hospital, Medan City, where no one voted; at Atma Husada Mahakam Hospital, 4 Laporan Komnas HAM RI terkait Pemantauan Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Legislatif 2019. 17