SUHAKAM Report of Public Inquiry into the Incidents During and After the Public Assembly of 28 April 2012 2.9 While the Panel is appreciative of the co-operation and assistance rendered by PDRM in providing names of its police personnel, it is disappointed that notwithstanding several and repeated requests, PDRM failed to provide the names of police personnel on duty at Jalan Tun Perak after 3.00 pm where the alleged incidents of use of disproportionate and unwarranted force took place. In particular, the names of those on general duties (GDs) were not made available to the Panel. PDRM also did not send personnel who could answer the allegations made during the testimonies of the various civilian witnesses. As a result, the Panel was not able to obtain direct responses to many of the allegations made during the hearing, thus forcing the Panel to draw various inferences, not all of which are necessarily favourable to PDRM. 2.10 The Panel would also like to record that several key witnesses did not assist the Inquiry to the best of their abilities and either failed to provide or were not forthcoming in providing crucial information during the hearing. One key witness from PDRM also failed or was unable to identify the police personnel depicted in the video clips notwithstanding specific instructions from the Panel to supply the information upon his recall to the stand. 2.11 There were also several medical personnel who were not co-operative and did not assist the Panel by providing testimonies based on medical reports prepared by them. 9