Endnotes 191 192 See generally Clement Hamani et al., ‘Memory 206 Enhancement induced by hypothalamic/fornix deep to Offenders with Cognitive-Emotional Impairments: brain stimulation’ (2008) 63(1) Annals of Neurobiology. Ethical and Criminal Justice Aspects’ (2020) Laura Klaming and Anton Vedder, ‘Brushing up on our Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity 127, 133. Memories: Can we use Neurotechnologies to Improve Eyewitness Memory?’ (2015) Law, Innovation and 193 207 ‘Neuroprevention: Developing Legal Policies in Risk Clement Hamani et al, ‘Memory Enhancement Induced Assessment Without Aspiring to Predict Crime’ (2021) 63(1) Annals of Neurobiology 119, 119. Journal of Science & Law. 208 Marcello Ienca & Roberto Andorno, ‘Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and biological treatment’ (2010) 38(2) Behavioural Sciences & the Law 165, 136. 209 (eds), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Policy 1, 3. (Report No 129, 1 March 2016) [10.10.]. 197 Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice, Engaging Australian Law Reform Commission, Traditional Rights and Freedoms – Encroachments by Commonwealth Laws Philosophy. 210 Biological Treatment’ (2010) 38(2) Behavioural Sciences Framing Commonwealth Offences, Infringement Notices 198 Frédéric Gilbert and Susan Dodds, ‘Is there Anything & the Law 135, 136. 211 Biological Treatment’ (2010) 38(2) Behavioural Sciences Prevent Convicted Offenders from Reoffending’ (2020) Mental Capacity 113, 116. 199 & the Law 135, 140. 212 200 201 Walter Glannon, ‘Neuroprosthetics, Behavior Control Biological Treatment’ (2010) 38(2) Behavioural Sciences & the Law 135, 142. 213 Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) s 6(1). and Criminal Responsibility’ (2020) Neurointerventions 214 Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) s 6(1). and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity 89, 99. 215 Walter Glannon, ‘Neuroprosthetics, Behavior Control 216 17 Criminal Law and Philosophy. Emma Dore-Horgan, ‘Do Criminal Offenders Have a 203 217 and Philosophy 429, 447. 204 Emma Dore-Horgan, ‘Do Criminal Offenders Have a Right to Neurorehabilitation?’ (2022) 17 Criminal Law and Philosophy 429, 433. 205 Allan McCay, ‘Neurotechnology and Human Rights: Developments Overseas and the Challenge for Australia’ (2023) Australian Journal of Human Rights 1, 6; Emma Dore-Horgan, ‘Do Criminal Offenders Have a Right to Neurorehabilitation?’ (2022) 17 Criminal Law and Philosophy 429, 434. Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Government Response Privacy Act Review’ (Report, 2023) 21. 218 Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Government Response Privacy Act Review’ (Report, 2023) 5. Emma Dore-Horgan, ‘Do Criminal Offenders Have a Right to Neurorehabilitation?’ (2022) 17 Criminal Law Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Government Response Privacy Act Review’ (Report, 2023) 21. Right to Neurorehabilitation?’ (2022) 17 Criminal Law and Philosophy 429, 432-433. Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Government Response Privacy Act Review’ (Report, 2023) 3. See generally Emma Dore-Horgan, ‘Do Criminal Offenders Have a Right to Neurorehabilitation?’ (2022) 202 Natasha Knack, ‘A Qualitative Study of Forensic Patients’ Perceptions of Quasi-coercive Offers of and Criminal Responsibility’ (2020) Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity 89, 95. Natasha Knack, ‘A Qualitative Study of Forensic Patients’ Perceptions of Quasi-coercive Offers of Wrong with Using AI Implantable Brain Devices to Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Natasha Knack, ‘A Qualitative Study of Forensic Patients’ Perceptions of Quasi-coercive Offers of Attorney-General’s Department (Cth), A Guide to and Enforcement Powers (2011) [2.26]. Jonathan Pugh, ‘Coercion and the Neurocorrective Offer’ (2018), in David Birks, and Thomas Douglas Neurotechnology’ (2017) 13(5) Life Sciences, Society and 196 Natasha Knack, ‘A qualitative study of forensic patients’ perceptions of quasi-coercive offers of AHRC, submission to United Nations’ Advisory Committee to the Human Rights Council (02 July 2023) 14. 195 See generally Aura Ruiz & José Muñoz, Technology 203, 213. by Hypothalamic/fornix Deep Brain Stimulation’ (2009) 194 Farah Focquaert et al., ‘Offering Neurointerventions 219 Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Privacy Act Review Report 2022’ (Report, 2023) 28-29. 220 Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Government Response Privacy Act Review’ (Report, 2023) 19. 221 See AHRC, submission to Attorney-General’s Department Privacy Act Review Report 2022 (2023) 46-48. 222 Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Government Response Privacy Act Review’ (Report, 2023) 8. 223 Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Government Response Privacy Act Review’ (Report, 2023) 8. Australian Human Rights Commission 45